CDS 180908-JLR CRSS-
//////////////////////
Neuroaesthetics promises to reinvigorate science's search for a theory of beauty.
by Moheb Costandi
• Posted September 16, 2008 08:48 AM
Illustration by Gluekit.
Why is something beautiful? David Hume argued that beauty exists not
in things but "in the mind that contemplates them." And everyone has at
some point heard the old saw that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
But Plato had a fanciful answer made to argue for a universal truth: In
his world of forms, he claimed there existed a perfect Form of Beauty,
which was imperfectly manifested in what we call beautiful. Despite the
allure of Plato's metaphorical claim, students of aesthetics have
struggled to substantiate it. Evolutionary psychologists have argued
that there exist quantifiable, describable, universal aspects to the
human capacity for appreciating beautiful forms, perhaps originating in
our ancestors' experience on African savannas or in the need to find
suitable mates. They have not solved the problem. However, recent work
by several researchers at University College London?—?including the
establishment of the first major grant-driven research program for the
neurobiological investigation of aesthetics, or neuroaesthetics?—?has
made the first steps toward a unified biocultural theory of art. An
object's beauty may not be universal, but the neural basis for
appreciating beauty probably is. The researchers' initial discoveries
and the increasing formalization of the field promise to open the way
for the first time to an understanding of beauty based on something
other than speculation.
The first studies of aesthetics and the
brain began with the sort of self-experimentation that science doesn't
encourage anymore. In the 1920s neurologist Heinrich Klüver documented
the hallucinations he experienced while under the influence of
mescaline, using four categories: grids, zigzags, spirals, and curves.
Noting their similarity to the hallucinations experienced in various
conditions, such as migraine, sensory deprivation, and the hypnagogic
state that occurs in the transition from wakefulness to sleep, he named
them "form constants." These motifs do indeed seem to be
constant?—?they recur throughout history and across cultures, and can
be seen, for example, in prehistoric cave paintings, in the girih
patterns of the tile mosaics decorating medieval mosques, and in the
repeating tessellations of M.C. Escher's impossible figures or the
rectangular forms of Mondrian's Compositions. Underlying those
patterns, at least in part, are the intrinsic properties of the visual
nervous system. Most neurons in the primary visual cortex occur in
repeating structures called ocular dominance columns; these in turn are
organized into hypercolumns, whose long-range interconnections are
arranged geometrically. The spontaneous activity of these neural
networks gives rise to the patterns Klüver studied.
The "uglier" a painting, the greater the motor cortex activity, as if the brain was preparing to escape.
Such investigations of the biology of aesthetics, however, had
heretofore not been anyone's primary research focus; rather, the
investigations have been subordinated to some other work, such as
modelling the visual system. Semir Zeki of University College London is
pioneering modern neuroaesthetics, and, thanks in part to a £1 million
grant from the Wellcome Trust in the UK last autumn, is forging ahead
with a research program that tries to establish the neurobiological
underpinnings for creativity, beauty, and even love.
Zeki's work has been ongoing for several years. In 2004 he led a
neuroimaging study designed to investigate the neural correlates of
beauty. Ten participants were shown 300 paintings and asked to classify
each of them as beautiful, ugly, or neutral. Paintings rated as
beautiful by some of the participants were rated as ugly by others, and
vice versa. The participants were then shown the paintings again while
lying in a scanner. "Beautiful" paintings elicited increased activity
in the orbito-frontal cortex, which is involved in emotion and reward.
Interestingly, the "uglier" a painting, the greater the motor cortex
activity, as if the brain was preparing to escape. More recently, Zeki
has started to collaborate with scholars from the arts and humanities
under the guidance of a multidisciplinary advisory board that includes
author A.S. Byatt and Jonathan Miller, a physician and opera producer.
Richard Morris, head of neuroscience and mental health at the
Wellcome Trust, says Zeki's work "gives insight into what it is to be
human." And according to Wellcome senior scientist John Williams, could
reveal some of the underpinnings of conditions, such as depression,
that are marked by a reduced aesthetic sense.
Elsewhere at UCL, neuroscientist Hugo Spiers is investigating how
the brain encodes direction, location, and the dimensions of
space?—?the implications for architecture could be profound. Spiers
recently collaborated with artist Antoni Malinowski and architect
Bettina Vismann on a project that aimed to explore the relationship
between art, architecture, and the brain. Funded by the Wellcome Trust,
the project resulted in an installation called Neurotopographics,
which tracked the relationship between movement though space and the
activity of the brain. "When someone traverses a space, their brain
produces an oscillating, rhythmic pattern," Spiers explains. "We tried
to realize this abstract understanding into an everyday reality."
As for architecture, altering space can have a large impact on brain
function. Changing the dimensions of an animal's enclosure causes grid
cells to alter their scales accordingly, such that the periodicity of
their firing, which is observed as the animal moves across a space,
increases or decreases. Surprisingly, negotiating a corridor in
opposite directions elicits completely different patterns of place-cell
activity, so the same space is apparently encoded as two different
places. A less surprising but still important finding is that the lack
of easily recognizable landmarks causes disorientation. Spiers and his
colleagues are now investigating how the brain encodes
three-dimensional space. While recording neuronal activity as rats
negotiated a spiral staircase, they found that place cells, but not
grid cells, respond to changes in height. Thus, the brain seems to
encode the vertical and horizontal dimensions in different ways.
Such knowledge of spatial cognition provides an understanding of the
brain's response to the built environment and can inform architects as
they consider the aesthetic elements and function of a space. "From an
architectural point of view," says Vismann, "I find the correspondence
between what occurs in the brain and the physical nature of space and
spatial navigation fascinating." She expects that understanding the
neural bases of spatial perception will inspire projects, inform the
design process, and help formulate ways of organizing space.
Future work may elucidate the long-term effects of one's
surroundings on brain function and the relationship between
aesthetically pleasing spaces and their functionality. What one
considers beautiful is, of course, influenced by culture, learning, and
experience, and not everything we find beautiful will ultimately be
traceable to the structure and function of our brain. The larger
question "What is beauty?" still poses a major challenge, but answering
it no longer seems so impossible.
//////////////////////////////Judy writes: "And for awhile at least, through us (and probably
elsewhere through others), the universe knows something of itself, and
this also is cause for celebration. "
Amen. A beautiful idea. There are two things that have obscured this
idea. One is the belief that there is a conscious God "out there." The
other is that we (as humans) are somehow outside of the realm of
Nature. But once we accept the idea that there is not some disembodied
god out there, and also that we are fully a part of Nature, then the
idea emerges that when we observe, ponder, and appreciate the Universe,
we are the Universe observing, pondering, and appreciating itself.
Through being conscious we "realize" the Universe, we make it real.
(Imagine a universe just like this one, but that never puts forth a
living, aware being. In what sense does it exist? In what sense does it
matter?) In a way, we are each of us a kind of Atlas, holding the
universe on our shoulders (in the awareness of our heads). And if one
takes this seriously, then one may find it a virtue to try to be more
deeply observant, thoughtful, and appreciative of the Universe (which
includes our own being).
Thomas
////////////////////////////Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other.
— Abraham Lincoln
//////////////////////////////“Because we all share this small planet earth, we have to learn to live
in harmony and peace with each other and with nature. That is not just
a dream, but a necessity.”
///////////////////////////////////////
POSTED BY bobby maz AT 9/18/2008 4:22 PM
0 COMMENTS
» POST A COMMENT
| DIGG IT
« BACK HOME
|
MY PROFILE
Name: bobby maz
Location:
RECENT POSTS
“Let us be silent, that we may hear the whispers of the gods.” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
SENSE OF BNG IGNRD IN DEPTT
JLACD-BTWCI
cds 140908-DLHI BLSTS-RAFOD-AOD-JLR CRSS-BCK TO ANRCHY
TECALID CRSS

|